Types, management and complications in paediatric distal radial fractures sustained during COVID-19 lockdown.

In response to the coronavirus pandemic the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines advised treating distal radial fractures non-operatively where possible. A cohort was studied retrospectively to assess whether the COVID pandemic lockdown within the UK altered types, the management and complications of paediatric distal radial fractures. The cohort studied comprised of 194 paediatric distal radial fractures in the pre-COVID cohort and 101 fractures in the COVID cohort. There was no significant differences in the type of fractures in the two cohorts. Significantly more high energy injuries were sustained among the COVID cohort than the pre-COVID (p < 0.001). The COVID cohort had significantly more patients managed in cast (p < 0.001) and significantly more managed with K-wire fixation (p = 0.049). The COVID cohort had significantly more complications (p = 0.016) at minimum 10-month follow-up. The results suggest that treatment of paediatric distal radial fractures during lockdown was too conservative and subsequent complications may put additional strain on orthopaedic services.Level of evidence: IV.

Changing To Removable Casts During The Coronavirus Pandemic – Has It Affected Outcomes For Distal Radius Fractures? (preprint)

Background: BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma & Orthopaedics) guidelines recommended that during the coronavirus pandemic most upper limb fractures should be treated conservatively, and removable casts should be used, where possible. As a result, our district general hospital started using a new soft combination (soft-combi) casting technique for conservative management of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in an attempt to reduce follow-up attendances.Aims: To assess if radiological outcomes of soft-combi casts are better or worse than previously used rigid casts for DRFs.Methods: 20 DRFs treated with soft-combi casts were compared with 20 DRFs treated with the old rigid cast types. Radiological parameters were measured pre-manipulation, post-manipulation, at 2-week follow-up, and at final follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for significant differences seen at follow-up between the groups.Results: The mean loss of volar angulation seen at 2-week follow-up was 4.9 degrees for the rigid casts vs. 1.5 degrees for the soft-combi casts (p=0.158). The mean loss of radial height after 2 weeks was 0.2 mm vs 0.5 mm (p=0.675), and the mean loss of radial inclination was 2.0 degrees vs 1.0 degrees (p=0.349), respectively.Conclusion: The soft-combi casts appeared to be equally effective at maintaining the reduction of DRFs compared to their rigid counterparts, as no statistically significant difference was seen in our study. We can be reassured that continued use of these removable casts in the current climate is unlikely to have a detrimental effect on outcomes for DRFs.

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in children and adults during the COVID-19 pandemic - a two-center study.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) constitute 15-21% of all fractures. There are no detailed data on the possible changes in the epidemiology and treatment of DRFs in children and adults during the Covid pandemic. The purpose of our study was a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on distal radius fractures (DRF) epidemiology, including both children and adults and various fracture fixation methods in two large trauma centers in Poland. METHODS: This study compared the medical data on the treatment of distal radius fractures in Poland in two periods: the period of the COVID-19 pandemic (from March 15 to October 15, 2020) and the corresponding period prior to the pandemic (from March 15 to October 15, 2019). We assessed detailed data from two trauma centers for pediatric and adult patients. Outpatients seeking medical attention at emergency departments and inpatients undergoing surgery at trauma-orthopedic wards were evaluated. We compared epidemiological data, demographic data, treatment type, and hospital stay duration. RESULTS: The total number of patients hospitalized due to DRF during the pandemic was 180, it was 15.1% lower than that from the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period (212). In the case of adult patients, the total number of those hospitalized during the pandemic decreased significantly (by 22%) from 132 to 103 patients. Analysis of the individual treatment methods revealed that the number of adults who underwent conservative treatment was considerably (by 30.3%) significantly lower in the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, from 119 to 83 patients. Compared to 13 patients from the pre-pandemic period, the number of surgically treated adults statistically increased to 20 patients (by 53.8%). Our analyses showed hospitalizations of surgically treated adults to be shorter by 12.7% during the pandemic, with the corresponding hospitalizations of surgically treated pediatric patients to be shorter by11.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology and treatment of DRFs in children and adults. We found decreased numbers of pediatric and adult patients with DRFs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic caused an increase in the number of children and significantly increase adults undergoing surgical treatment for DRFs, a decrease in mean patient age, shorter significantly length of hospital stay, and an increased number of men with DRFs.

The hidden dangers of staying home: a London trauma unit experience of lockdown during the COVID-19 virus pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in reconfiguration of the NHS. Elective services were stopped and trauma services focused on decreasing patient-clinician interactions and managing injuries nonoperatively wherever possible. The everyday life of the general public changed dramatically with the introduction of a national lockdown to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This paper looks at the experience of a South West London trauma unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients reviewed in fracture clinic and by the orthopaedic on-call team between 23 March to 23 April 2020 were included. Data on the mechanism of injury and whether this was a usual activity, the injury sustained and its management were collected. RESULTS: A total of 167 trauma injuries were seen, compared with 735 new patients with injuries in the previous month. The number of trauma operations completed decreased by 38%; 55% of injuries occurred inside the home and 44% outside the home during daily exercise. Some 31% of injuries were secondary to a new activity taken up during lockdown. Three open fractures and two polytrauma cases were seen that would have normally been managed at the local major trauma centre. CONCLUSION: Overall, both the number of injuries seen and trauma operations completed during the enforced lockdown decreased. This is probably due to a change in the way the general public are living their lives, and the reconfigurations within the NHS in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is an interesting time within trauma and orthopaedic departments, as they continue to adapt to the changing injuries and working environment.

Epidemiology of Distal Radius Fractures in Children and Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic – A Two-Center Study (preprint)

Bacground: The purpose of our study was a comprehensive assessment of the impact of theCOVID-19 pandemic on distal radius fractures(DRF)epidemiology,including both children and adults and various fracture fixation methods in two large trauma centers in Poland. Methods: : This study compared the data on the treatment of distal radius fractures in Poland in two periods:the period of the COVID-19 pandemic and the corresponding period prior to the pandemic.We assessed detailed data from two trauma centers for pediatric and adult patients.We compared epidemiological data,demographic data,treatment type,and hospital stay duration. Results: : The total number of patients hospitalized due to DRF during the pandemic was 15.1% lower than that from the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period.In the case of adult patients, the total number of those hospitalized during the pandemic decreased significantly(by 22%) from132 to103patients.Analysis of the individual treatment methods revealed that the number of adults who underwent conservative treatment was considerably(by 30.3%)significantly lower in the period of the COVID-19 pandemic.Compared to the figures from the pre-pandemic period,the number of surgically treated adults was significantly higher(by 53.8%).Our analyses showed hospitalizations of surgically treated adults to be shorter by 12.7%during the pandemic,with the corresponding hospitalizations of surgically treated pediatric patients to be shorter by11.5%. Conclusions: : Our study showed decreased numbers of pediatric and adult patients with DRFs during the COVID-19 pandemic.The pandemic caused an increase in the number of children and significantly increase adults undergoing surgical treatment for DRFs, a decrease in mean patient age,shorter significantly durations of hospital stay, and an increased number of men with DRFs.

Approaching "Elective" Surgery in the Era of COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for the health care system. To meet capacity demands, hospitals around the world suspended surgeries deemed to be elective. In hand surgery, numerous pathologies are treated on an elective basis, but a delay or absence of care may result in poorer outcomes. Here, we present an ethical framework for prioritizing elective surgery during a period of resource scarcity. Instead of using the term "elective," we define procedures that can be safely delayed on the basis of 3 considerations. First, a safe delay is possible only if deferral will not result in permanent injury. Second, a delay in care will come with tolerable costs and impositions that can be appropriately managed in the future. Third, a safe delay will preserve the bioethical principle of patient autonomy. In considering these criteria, 3 case examples are discussed considering individual patient characteristics and the pathophysiology of the condition. This framework design is applicable to ambulatory surgery in any period of crisis that may strain resources, but further considerations may be important if an operation requires hospital admission.